<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll: In Your Backyard?</title>
	<atom:link href="/2012/03/poll-in-your-backyard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://somervillescout.com/2012/03/poll-in-your-backyard/</link>
	<description>Somerville Events, News &#38; Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:01:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobelia McSnark</title>
		<link>https://somervillescout.com/2012/03/poll-in-your-backyard/comment-page-1/#comment-2071</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobelia McSnark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://somervillescout.com/?p=6004#comment-2071</guid>
		<description>I agree that the &quot;just not here&quot; option makes no sense, but why should we prevent hypocritical NIMBYists from outing themselves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the &#8220;just not here&#8221; option makes no sense, but why should we prevent hypocritical NIMBYists from outing themselves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyce Junior</title>
		<link>https://somervillescout.com/2012/03/poll-in-your-backyard/comment-page-1/#comment-2070</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyce Junior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://somervillescout.com/?p=6004#comment-2070</guid>
		<description>The second option of &quot;I support it, just not here&quot; should be eliminated.  If you do not support someting in your backyard, you do not support it, period.  On the plus side for opponents, this means the &quot;No&#039;s&quot; are almost 20 percent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second option of &#8220;I support it, just not here&#8221; should be eliminated.  If you do not support someting in your backyard, you do not support it, period.  On the plus side for opponents, this means the &#8220;No&#8217;s&#8221; are almost 20 percent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Beckmann</title>
		<link>https://somervillescout.com/2012/03/poll-in-your-backyard/comment-page-1/#comment-2069</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Beckmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://somervillescout.com/?p=6004#comment-2069</guid>
		<description>&quot;Affordable housing&quot; is not poor people&#039;s housing, no matter what rhetoric is used. As a landlord on Union Square, I charge the same $1200 SCC would charge, and house two very nice tenants who work for a living. If these remarkably angry neighbors knew just a little more they&#039;d be very, very grateful for SCC&#039;s plan to create offices and affordable units that neither block their view nor generate too much traffic, a block from where, when Route 28 loses its falling down bridge, a whole new traffic pattern will emerge. They should do some homework before they open themselves to obvious arguments for affordability: it could go to the Homeless Coalition or the Housing Authority, and then they&#039;d see a very different bunch of neighbors. Who, by the way, are right across the street from the cops... Maybe we ought to invite DYS and DOC for a post-release program, given that location?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Affordable housing&#8221; is not poor people&#8217;s housing, no matter what rhetoric is used. As a landlord on Union Square, I charge the same $1200 SCC would charge, and house two very nice tenants who work for a living. If these remarkably angry neighbors knew just a little more they&#8217;d be very, very grateful for SCC&#8217;s plan to create offices and affordable units that neither block their view nor generate too much traffic, a block from where, when Route 28 loses its falling down bridge, a whole new traffic pattern will emerge. They should do some homework before they open themselves to obvious arguments for affordability: it could go to the Homeless Coalition or the Housing Authority, and then they&#8217;d see a very different bunch of neighbors. Who, by the way, are right across the street from the cops&#8230; Maybe we ought to invite DYS and DOC for a post-release program, given that location?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
